A comparison between Call of Duty and Battlefield - Is Call of Duty WWII really better than Battlefield I?

A comparison between Call of Duty and Battlefield - Is Call of Duty WWII really better than Battlefield I?

Now that we have had enough time to test the latest version of the Call of Duty, it is safe to say that we can finally compare it to Battlefield 1, which shares the same principles in the gameplay and overall atmosphere as CoD has been heading for several future releases since 2013. If Call of Duty WWII vs Battlefield I, which is the best war game?

In order to compare the two giants of fire, we will divide the subject into key points to talk about what the two games have done in common, in order to find out which one has done the best. If you are confused by choosing the right game for the holiday season, you will find your answer here, so get ready to go back to the traditional battlefield with us and start..

The story

 Some may argue that both the Battlefield and Call of Duty series do not really focus on the style of the story anymore, with their greater focus on the style of team play, but we know that a good number of fans still want to play solo and live a fair, For a few hours. Yes, you can say that the individual style has become a training stage to enter competitions with other players over the Internet recently, but the BF1 and WWII proved to be a good fun experience.

On the one hand Call of Duty is known for presenting action-packed scenarios that appear to have come from a film directed by Michael Bay, and the Modern Warfare sub-series has proven to be the best in the history of shooting games. Was WWII able to reach the high level Achieved by its predecessor? In fact, it's mixed here.

Although the new part of CoD has the usual fun and excitement of the past, it fails to make us really care about the story and the main characters. The promotional promises were a violent story that tells the horrors of wars and hell that the soldiers are going through psychologically, but we felt that this was not quite present during the few hours that the storytelling pattern continued, which was a mixture of all the films of the Second World War that we had seen Satisfaction. There are a few stages in which we were able to stick our seats in front of the screen in anticipation and excitement, but the whole thing was a fun trip: fun until the end and then forget all related to it.

In Battlefield I, on the other hand, a narrative pattern consisting of six different scenarios of realistic battles during the First World War was presented. From the bloodstained French squares to the golden sands of the Arabian Desert, developers at DICE have been able to present a story centered around the experiences of their various characters in a framework that allows players to experience all kinds of vehicles and weapons available in the game that give an accurate idea of what to expect in a group mode.

Despite the power of writing those heroic scenarios that brought the world war to life, breaking up the story into short parts had its own disadvantages. Some of these parts were better than others, which made us want to spend more time with the heroes, but their shortness and diversity varied make them dispersed as a complete story.

Overall, we can say that the winner of this tour is, perhaps for the first time in a comparison between the two games, Battlefield I. epic short stories with a wide and stylistic design that will make you want to go back and play through your favorite scenarios more than once, while Call of Duty WWII An experience that can pull you back with a story style that lacks creativity in the novel of events that seem to have seen dozens of times so far.

Group play

It is difficult to put the two games within a unified framework in this area, but we will try what we can equal them together. For both the two large bands, which can accommodate more than 60 players at Battlefield and require tactical tactical play, our small maps, designed with the finest detail to provide a thrilling, collective experience, require constant action by players and a willingness to face their opponents right behind each other. angle.

Call of Duty in WWII has abandoned what has caused many complaints from fans - the supernatural abilities of jumping and flying high thanks to jet bags and other future electronic gadgets that seemed unfair to traditional warriors and direct docking. They are both here again without losing Their pleasure is thanks to a continuous circle of playing to earn points for better weapons, wider advantages, different accessories and more and then back again.

Battlefield I, on the other hand, is not ashamed to prolong its stay with each new team game. The aim here is to provide a more realistic simulation of an actual battlefield with large numbers of soldiers and vehicles across a wide area. You will find yourself forced to work in a team with other players, and the right communication will reward you with an unrivaled experience of epic clashes in defense of a point or acquisition of an enemy base. Of course there are classic styles that put two teams against each other in a struggle to get killed more points, but it still tends to In total tactically the most needed for the organization which has special pleasure with a group of friends.

So if you get back here. Do you prefer to go directly to the battlefields full of excitement to play short games fun or would you like to invest more time to live moments epic war fought until the last minute? For us, we see that both games have their own place, so there is no specific winner in this paragraph.

Contents

I've completed the story and played enough of the group maps available on the game disc. What will keep you attracted over the next few months? In fact, both Battlefield 1 and Call of Duty WWII answer this with additional content in new maps that add more fun with a season Pass driven that gives owners the ability to get all new for months after the launch of the game.

Although Battlefield I has provided a number of new maps and tools, most recently the In The Name of Tsar, which has the potential to play combat soldiers as well as the French Army, CoD WWII also offers similarities through new maps every few months. It was almost like a match here, but we can only go back to the fun-loving Zombies style of Call of Duty, which offers a totally different style that is almost perfect for being a separate game. Thanks to this, the winner in this round is Call of Duty WWII.

Graphics, effects and sounds

We can not talk about battlefields without talking about how they are presented, be it the quality of graphics and reality or the different effects of the sounds of explosions and fire to how the fire looks and the debris scattered. For example, Call of Duty WWII provided a vivid example of the "if not broken" formula by using the same graphic engine used in previous parts, which although World War II environments differ from the above, still have the same feeling as before.

That does not mean that the graphics here are not pretty to look at, but looking at what DICE can do with the latest versions of the new Frostbite Engine, everything WWII offers seems cool compared. From the accuracy and realness of surrounding environments to the most brilliant lighting system and the reflections on weapons and vehicles, Battlefield I has been able to offer the best graphic experience in the history of war games so far, the most realistic and attractive.

Sound effects tend to fit Battlefield 1 too, with a vast library of realistic sounds captured from real weapons, unlike the sounds of CoD WWII that you'll feel you've heard in many other places before. Explosions make you feel terrified, the sounds of flying planes panic, and the different melodies add to that epic feeling that makes BF1 an atmospherical experience in every sense of the word.

The winner here, in comparison to the whole, is Battlefield I. With an interesting narrative style, a collective experience based on skill, sophistication and spectacular effects, the latest releases of the classic shooting series remain one of the best fighting games available even more than a year after launch. This does not mean that you will not have a good time with Call of Duty WWII too. The fast addictive collective style and zombies have proven their usual pleasure, but the series may have begun to show signs of aging and need to make bigger changes the next time to make them stand out from the rest.

Winner: Battlefield 1